Commentaire de lsga sur De la cosmonadologie quantique à la biologie et la conscience

Commentaire de lsga
sur De la cosmonadologie quantique à la biologie et la conscience

Voir l'int�gralit� des commentaires de cet article

lsga 15 octobre 2014 15:51

autre exemple, simplement pour dire que l’absence de r�f�rences dans vos textes montre clairement que vous �tes un penseur isol� qui croit avoir tout compris dans son coin, alors que vos positions

sont une des positions m�taphysiques possibles, explor�e depuis longtemps :

A variety of such models have been proposed including the following. David Chalmers (1996) has offered an admittedly speculative version of panpsychism which appeals to the notion of information not only to explain psycho-physical invariances between phenomenal and physically realized information spaces but also to possibly explain the ontology of the physical as itself derived from the informational (a version of “it from bit” theory). In a somewhat similar vein, Gregg Rosenberg has (2004) proposed an account of consciousness that simultaneously addresses the ultimate categorical basis of causal relations. In both the causal case and the conscious case, Rosenberg argues the relational-functional facts must ultimately depend upon a categorical non-relational base, and he offers a model according to which causal relations and qualitative phenomenal facts both depend upon the same base. Also, as noted just above (section 9.8), some quantum theories treat consciousness as a fundamental feature of reality (Stapp 1993), and insofar as they do so, they might be plausibly classified as non-physical theories as well.

R�pondre

Voir ce commentaire dans son contexte