ALERTE

DESINFO CLASSIQUE :

The editors there were not, and have already deleted it. (Check out your link).

The argument was based on a misreading of timezones that could only have been deliberate.

BBC World always uses GMT a.k.a. UTC, not BST (British Summer Time) as the falsifier claimed. Furthermore, New York on 9/11 was on EDT, not EST. So the report at 10 pm UTC was in fact broadcast at 6 pm EDT and for once there is nothing to see here, folks.

(Except maybe we should now investigate why it took BBC World a whole 37 minutes before they reported on the collapse of WTC 7 ? )

The « member » who posted this deception had joined 911blogger FIVE HOURS before.

Another « member » was cheering the post, and urging that it be given front-page coverage. Had this happened, you can guess that ScrewLoose and Co. would have quickly put up thrilled denunciations of the gullible « troofers » etc. Which is probably coming anyway. (If a creationist farts in the woods, ScrewLoose will find a way to blame 9/11 skeptics for it.)

But come on, how the hell are you going to fool computer programmers with this kind of nonsense ? 911blogger.com pulled the story before I even got to alert them myself.

débunké par le site de gauche démocrate américain :

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=143584&mesg_id=143594

le site 911blogger (source) a retiré cette info

la différence horaire est seulement due à .. la différence horaire (la BBC envoie en GMT et les choses se passent en EST) Ajouter une heure pour l’heure d’été (GMT-1) par rapport à la France. Donc le rapport est arrivé une demi-heure aprés à la BBC.

Elementary, my dear Watson

apprenez l’anglais, ça sert quand on parle de l’Amérique et ça vous évitera d’envoyer des conneries en première page.