"This discussion can be infinite. >>Right. And the emmigration process is exponential. This is simply natural

« but no one wins ! » >>Not right. It’s clarifying at least opinions of each one. It’s trying to explain that someones being born in a territory or space not corresponding to their hope, in a deperate atmosphere without any possibility to get, on place, a response, are hoping normally to get it better somewhere.

« There is one obvious solution : emigrate. » >>You get it.

"It is too late for Europe, too many foreigners have come inside, and they have huge families, supported by the state ! A recipe for extinction of the original inhabitants ! (I did not know 40% of Belgium was immigrant, this is an invasion that is outrageous)" >>I don’t know how you are counting 40% ? Is it a matter of the counting departure. We have a long history of invaders of all kinds. Recent immigration is not so heavy. Don’t be so afraid. We have to distilate it. That’s right.

« ....I think I would also leave and move to Canada, USA, Australia...and start over with my life.... » >>and the loop is going forward.

« Why did the state allow so many foreigners to come in ?(Is it like America where we have millions of ’illegals’ drifting around ?) » >> States are trying to minimize it. Just a question : What’s the physical difference between legals and illegals ? Is it for collecting the tax ? Is it for not allowing the disparity bewteen those who have to ? (equity I like). How do you consider the previous waves of immigrants in the US when there were only Indians in place ?